DISQUALIFIED FROM PRACTICING MEDICINE FOR EXPRESSING DEEPLY HELD RELIGIOUS VIEWS ON FACEBOOK

Posted on by

Dr Jereth Kok Guilty of Professional Misconduct for Social Media Posts, Tribunal Rules, Kurt Mahlburg, 28 July 2025 NEWS

A landmark free speech case has found that Dr Jereth Kok’s Christian and conservative views disqualify him from medical practice, even though his social media posts weren’t directed at patients and most were shared with limited visibility.

In a 186-page ruling handed down last Tuesday, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) found that Dr Kok’s deeply held religious views, expressed on social media between 2008 and 2022, were sufficient grounds to indefinitely suspend him from the medical profession.

Dr Kok — who had no prior history of patient complaints or professional misconduct before his suspension — now faces a separate sanctions hearing in early 2026 that could result in the full cancellation of his medical license.

In Medical Board of Australia v Dr Jereth Kok, VCAT assessed 85 social media posts made by Dr Kok on topics ranging from abortion to same-sex marriage, sex change surgery for children, COVID-19 mandates and “conversion therapy” bans.

The Tribunal concluded that two-thirds of the posts “denigrated, demeaned and slurred” members of protected identity groups and other medical practitioners, and also contributed to vaccine hesitancy.

Featured among Dr Kok’s 54 incriminating posts were two articles from satirical news site The Babylon Bee, a Spectator Australia column authored by Moira Deeming, an open letter from the Australian Christian Lobby, an X post by children’s advocate Katy Faust, a link to the Ezekiel Declaration, comments left on Bill Muehlenberg’s website CultureWatch, and an article published at The Daily Declaration written by the author of this report.

Criticism of “Gender-Affirming Care” Penalised

Other posts cited in Dr Kok’s suspension took aim at so-called “gender-affirming care” — a protocol that can result in chemical and surgical castration, and that remains the subject of growing controversy and regulatory pushback around the world.

One involved a non-public Facebook repost of an article from The Spectator Australia, written by Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming and titled, “The cultural juggernaut of transgender ideology: not kids’ stuff”.

The Tribunal ruled that, by sharing Deeming’s article, Dr Kok “failed to behave professionally and courteously to other medical practitioners, as it referred to medical practitioners involved in the treatment of gender dysphoria as ‘mad scientists’ and engaging in transgender ideology”.

Another post, also shared with limited visibility, was a link to the Australian Christian Lobby’s “Open Letter to the Hon Daniel Andrews, Premier of Victoria”, to which Dr Kok added his own commentary:

Attention Victorian parents. One part of the diabolical ‘conversion or suppression’ bill that has received comparatively less attention: parents who try to STOP their child being sent away for bodily disfigurement will be charged with domestic violence. Yes, you read that right. Standing in the way of permanent bodily injury = violence. Sign this open letter to the Premier.

VCAT ruled that this post “failed to respect gender diversity” and was “denigrating, demeaning, disrespectful and derogatory to LGBTQI+ persons as it indicates that treatment for gender dysphoria is bodily disfigurement”.

Another post cited in the suspension of Dr Kok’s medical registration was an article he authored at Eternity News, formerly Australia’s flagship evangelical news website, titled “A Medical Perspective on Transgender”.

In ruling against Dr Kok, the Tribunal rejected his argument during cross-examination that gender dysphoria is a pathological or delusional belief analogous to other mistaken self-perceptions like anorexia nervosa. It also dismissed his claim that transgender identities are often shaped more by cultural trends and personal choice than irresistible feelings.

Jesus told us that in the last days persecution of Christians will increase because we hold to God’s values. The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) found that Dr Kok’s deeply held religious views, expressed on social media between 2008 and 2022, were sufficient grounds to indefinitely suspend him from the medical profession.

“Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake. And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another. And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” Matthew 24:9-14

INTENSIFYING PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS

Posted on by

Christianity is at risk of being “wiped out” in parts of the world due to intensifying persecution, the United Kingdom’s special envoy for freedom of religion or belief, David Smith, has warned. The British government is now targeting 10 countries as part of its revised foreign policy focus to defend this human right. Smith, the Labour Party MP for North Northumberland, made the remarks during a briefing at the Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office.

Jesus was asked by His disciples: “What will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” Matthew 24:3

Jesus response: “And you will hear of wars and rumours of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet. For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these are but the beginning of the birth pains.
“Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake. And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another. And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” Matthew 24:6-14

Smith, a Christian who previously worked with Tearfund and the Bible Society made no mention of the fact that what is unfolding fits with end times prophecies. but he did announced a new plan to prioritize Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) in countries where religious minorities face repression or violence. Smith said the U.K. will focus on 10 countries, naming Vietnam, Algeria, India, Nigeria, Pakistan, China, Syria, Ukraine, Afghanistan and Iraq. He said these were selected because of the severity of need, the U.K.’s diplomatic ties and the possibility of making progress.

He added that persecution, carried out both by governments and social groups, can involve harassment by police, social ostracism, detention without cause, denial of citizenship, torture, attacks on places of worship and even killings, citing research by the Pew Research Centre. He cited recent data showing that 380 million Christians face persecution worldwide and warned, “Persecution on the basis of religion or belief, enacted by States themselves and social groups, is taking place on every continent in the world.” Smith called the U.K.’s commitment “a new chapter” in foreign policy and said freedom of religion was interlinked with other liberties, including freedom of speech, conscience and assembly. Of the 10 selected, only three — Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan — are among the top 10 in the Open Doors World Watch List, which identifies countries where Christians are most severely persecuted. The worst offenders on that list, such as North Korea, Somalia and Yemen, are not among the U.K.’s current

The U.K. government’s FoRB strategy involves five strands. First, it aims to uphold international standards through bodies such as the U.N. and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Second, it will embed the issue into targeted bilateral diplomacy, encouraging individual missions to raise FoRB in foreign capitals. Third, the U.K. will strengthen international coalitions working on religious freedom. Fourth, the Foreign Office will incorporate FoRB into its mainstream human rights programming. The fifth strand involves collaboration with civil society groups working on interfaith respect and awareness. Speaking at the briefing, Lord Collins of Highbury, minister for human rights, said the U.K. has long believed that rights and the rule of law strengthen global prosperity and resilience. He said his office had already written to British heads of mission directing them to embed human rights, including FoRB, into all areas of diplomatic work. He cited the recent release of two individuals — Nigerian atheist Mubarak Bala and Cuban Pastor Lorenzo Rosales Fajardo — as examples of successful British-supported advocacy.

“Only by working together can we build a world where everyone, everywhere, can live with dignity, free to believe — or not believe — without fear,” Lord Collins said. In April, during a debate, Smith said Britain’s diplomatic stance is informed by its own history, moving “from persecution to pluralism,” which he said provides credibility to advocate abroad. He described the U.K. as “uniquely well placed” to act in support of religious liberty, citing its legacy of legal rights and peaceful pluralism. The role of FoRB envoy was created following a 2019 report by then-Bishop of Truro, Philip Mounstephen, which found that Foreign Office staff lacked awareness of global religious persecution. The report led to recommendations that religious freedom be formally integrated into U.K. foreign policy. Smith argued that defending FoRB not only benefits persecuted communities but also those who engage in repression. He said FoRB could unlock new opportunities and freedoms for their nations to flourish and reaffirmed his commitment to press the U.K. government to act. Meanwhile, Christian Today noted that new research by Jersey Road PR has found that mainstream U.K. media rarely report on attacks against Christians globally.

DEALING WITH OPPOSITION TO THE WORK OF GOD

Posted on by

The opposition Nehemiah received to rebuilding the ruined wall of the city of Jerusalem was intense.

“And I looked and arose and said to the nobles and to the officials and to the rest of the people, “Do not be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your brothers, your sons, your daughters, your wives, and your homes.” Nehemiah 4:14

Nehemiah’s story reminds us that vision always invites opposition. It’s not a question of if resistance will come — it’s when. And like Nehemiah, we must be ready.

When Nehemiah first declared his intent to rebuild Jerusalem’s walls, the opposition came swiftly. Sanballat and Tobiah mocked him, hoping to discourage the work before it began (Nehemiah 2:19). But Nehemiah didn’t waste energy arguing or defending himself. Instead, he declared boldly, “The God of heaven will give us success” (Nehemiah 2:20), and then he acted. His declaration was followed by the tangible obedience of God’s people, with priests and families taking up tools and rebuilding the gates and walls.

This is a key lesson for us: vision must be voiced, and faith must move our hands. When opposition comes early, our best weapon is conviction turned into action.

But opposition doesn’t only come at the beginning — it often intensifies midway. As the wall reached halfway, Nehemiah faced perhaps the most dangerous challenge yet: discouragement from within. The people grew weary, overwhelmed by the rubble. The enemies plotted to strike when no one was looking. It could have unravelled everything.

Nehemiah responded by pairing prayer with protection. He called on God, yes — but he also posted guards. He didn’t ignore the threat, nor did he allow fear to paralyse them. Then he stood before the people with this rallying cry: “Don’t be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your families” (Nehemiah 4:14).

That one verse contains the heart of godly leadership: a reminder of God’s greatness and a call to protect what matters most. It wasn’t just about the wall. It was about legacy, security, and God’s people stepping into their destiny.

Even after the wall was completed, Nehemiah wasn’t done with opposition. His enemies shifted tactics — no longer able to stop the work, they tried to steal his peace. They sent letters, spread gossip, and even used insiders to speak well of the enemy in Nehemiah’s presence (Nehemiah 6:17-19). Intimidation doesn’t always come as direct threat — it can be subtle, exhausting, persistent.

And yet, Nehemiah stood firm. The wall was completed in 52 days — a miracle by any measure — but the greater miracle was that Nehemiah remained unmoved in his purpose, even when the pressure shifted from external attack to internal erosion.

We must learn this pattern. At the start, we respond with declaration and action. In the middle, we must engage in prayer and protection. And after the victory, we stand in discernment and resolve, guarding the peace we’ve fought for.

This is not a one-time battle. Moses, Joseph, and even Jesus encountered wave after wave of resistance. It’s the nature of kingdom work. We are rebuilding in a time of spiritual vulnerability, but we are not without weapons. We’ve been given divine authority, heavenly wisdom, and the call to persevere.

As Nehemiah fought for the dignity of a people, we are called to fight for our families, our communities, and the moral fabric of our nation. Let us not grow weary. Let us not be caught off guard by resistance. The presence of opposition may be the clearest confirmation that we are doing what matters most.

God has begun a work through you — He will see it to completion.

WELCOME TO COUNTRY

Posted on by

Welcome to Country is controversial. Deeply. It divides Australians by ancestry, not allegiance. And Albanese knows it. He just doesn’t care, which is foolish, and it may cost him dearly.

He called it a “a hand warmly and graciously extended,” a symbol of unity. But how is it unifying to be told, day in and day out, that you need permission to enter your own country? How is it respectful to redefine Australians as tenants on ancestral land they supposedly never had a right to?

This isn’t some harmless courtesy. It’s a rhetorical landmine, paving the way for treaty, reparations, land vetoes, and perpetual grievance. “Always was, always will be.”

That’s how the slogan goes. That the land upon which the nation of Australia was built has forever been and forever will be under Aboriginal ownership.

But that’s not history. Rather, it’s a political claim of ongoing Indigenous sovereignty, directly contradicting High Court precedent and undermining the very legitimacy of the Australian nation-state. The Crown’s sovereignty is the foundation of our law. And yet we now begin our parliamentary business by implying it never existed.

And Albanese calls this uncontroversial?

Australians Have Had Enough

Aboriginal woman and Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price put it best: “Everyone’s getting sick of Welcome to Country.” It tells ordinary Australians they’re outsiders in the country they built, defended, and passed down through generations. The public agrees. Polling shows a clear majority now see these rituals as divisive.

A major poll of over 1,000 Australians conducted for the Institute of Public Affairs just last month confirms the shift: 56% of Australians now see Welcome to Country as divisive, while just 17% disagree. Fewer than one in three support the practice at events like ANZAC Day or sporting matches, and even among young Australians who normally support progressive fads, opinion is split.

Yet, despite the majority view, these rituals are conducted everywhere: before sports games, school assemblies, corporate webinars, and even weather forecasts. What used to be occasional is now obligatory. And like all forced rituals, its meaning has rotted into performance.

Let’s not pretend it’s “ancient” either. The modern Welcome to Country, body paint, didgeridoos, and scripted lines, is largely a 1970s invention, created by famous Australian Aboriginal Ernie Dingo and refined during the tourism boom.

And when we do these ceremonies, are we even sure that the so-called “traditional owners” are even the right one? Canberra’s “traditional ownership” is disputed between Ngunnawal and Ngambri groups, proving how shaky the whole edifice is. Look to just about any region in the country and I can show you warring groups of Aboriginals who claim that they are the rightful “traditional owners” over the other mob who claim the same thing.

The Financial — and Spiritual — Cost

If you’re Christian? Tough luck. Smoking ceremonies invoke spirits. They’re religious rites, not “cultural displays.” The Presbyterian Church has told its congregations not to participate. Yet we now open Parliament with them, as if the separation of church and state has been tossed into the firepit along with the gum leaves.

And the cost? It’s not just spiritual. The whole Welcome to Country farce also comes with a financial price tag. Freedom of Information documents show single ceremonies cost up to $6,600. Government departments are burning through taxpayer cash for smoke and theatre while remote schools rot and Indigenous literacy flatlines. One smoking ceremony could air-condition a classroom in Arnhem Land. But priorities, right?

Let’s not forget: Australians already voted on this nonsense. In the 2023 Voice referendum, they overwhelmingly rejected the entire race-based agenda. Sixty percent said no. Every state bar the ACT — the same bubble that hosts Parliament — voted it down.

But none of that matters to the elites. It’s not about truth. It’s about control. This is coercive speech. Refuse to recite it and you’re a bigot. Go along with it, and endorse a racial hierarchy where whitey is right at the bottom.

So when Albanese tells you there’s no controversy, he’s not speaking for you. He’s speaking to Canberra, to the elite, to the bureaucrats and boardrooms who recite the lines without believing them.

What we need is a national reset.

Start our events with this: “We gather as free and equal citizens of one Australia.”

And then acknowledge those who have fought and died for our nation.

No smoke. No spirits. No submission.

That’s unity. That’s patriotism. That’s truth.

And that, Prime Minister, is not controversial.

This post is taken from an article by George Christensen.

welcomed

Being Welcomed to Your Own Country Not Controversial, Says PM. on 24/07/2025.

George Christensen is an Australian politician and former journalist who was a member of the Australian House of Representatives from 2010 to 2022, as the member of parliament (MP) for the division of Dawson. He was a member of the Liberal National Party of Queensland and sat with the National Party in federal parliament, prior to leaving the party in April 2022, days before the end of his parliamentary term.

STEP CLOSER TO BIBLICAL ENDTIMES ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT

Posted on by

A new ruling from the United Nations has tightened the grip of climate change catastrophism.

In a 40-page mandate released on Wednesday, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) told nations to fall in line or face the World Court’s wrath.

Countries that fail to align with what amounts to Gaian worship will be punished with a similar ferocity of “justice” to those that commit war crimes, the court warned.

Consequences for not taking climate justice seriously, the ruling said, include “paying full reparations, restitution, compensation, and/or satisfaction.”

The ICJ added that any nation in breach of its Carbon Zero commitments — as outlined by the 2015 Paris Agreement, among others — must “employ all means at their disposal to ensure compliance.”

Despite the mandate not defining what compliance by “any means necessary” would look like, it’s fair to assume this means mutating Carbon Zero into Carbon Communism.

Lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are all measures prescribed by today’s climate catastrophists.

Carbon passports have already been tabled in the United Kingdom’s Net Zero nanny state, and are defined by the Institute of Sustainability Studies as:

Notably, the ICJ admitted climate change reparations may be “difficult to calculate, because of uncertainty about the role anthropogenic climate change played in causing the damage.”

Acknowledging its limited reach, the World Court concluded that it could only offer judicial advice in response to questions about who’s to blame and for what. At the same time, the ICJ said its latest “climate justice” ruling is unprecedented.

Climate catastrophism “is more than a legal problem,” the court determined. Rather, it is an “existential problem of planetary proportions that imperils all forms of life and the very health of our planet.”

Unsurprisingly, the IJC finished by implying that the “lasting solution” was compliance with Carbon Communism.

The only satisfactory answer, it said, is social and political action that “changes our habits, comforts and current way of life in order to secure a future.”

Overall, the World Court’s so-called urgent and “game-changing” determination is toothless. It is ultimately only the opinion of the UN court in answer to young climate activists who claim that islands like Vanuatu are shrinking.

It’s of no surprise that UN boss and “global boiling” believer Antonio Guterres was overjoyed by his court advocating COVID-like, climate crisis mitigation mandates.

Following claims that the so-called “climate crisis was laying waste to lives and livelihoods,” Guterres welcomed the ICJ’s ruling.

“They have made it very clear,” he said, “that States are obligated under international law to protect the global climate system.”

“This is a victory for our planet, for climate justice and for the power of young people to make a difference.”

The science justifying the World Court’s opinion is based on social justice, not a complete rendering of all the facts and variables that make up climate science. If you think I’m exaggerating, note that the language of “oppressor and oppressed” is implied in the repeated use of “climate crisis” and “climate justice” — whatever the latter even really means.

The mandate is also non-binding. Unlike war crimes tribunals, the UN’s Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change is not enforceable. Not yet enforceable, anyway.

As I’ve noted above, lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are exactly what the 40-page ICJ advice points us towards.

This mitigation mandate is a glimpse of an encroaching darkness that has little to do with science and everything to do with socialism.

What activists mean by “climate justice” is Carbon Communism. That’s the shadow cast by this new globalist dictate, as it green-lights the growth of the Net Zero nanny state.

The science justifying the World Court’s opinion is based on social justice, not a complete rendering of all the facts and variables that make up climate science.

If you think I’m exaggerating, note that the language of “oppressor and oppressed” is implied in the repeated use of “climate crisis” and “climate justice” — whatever the latter even really means.

The mandate is also non-binding. Unlike war crimes tribunals, the UN’s Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change is not enforceable.

Not yet enforceable, anyway.

As I’ve noted above, lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are exactly what the 40-page ICJ advice points us towards.

This mitigation mandate is a glimpse of an encroaching darkness that has little to do with science and everything to do with socialism.

What activists mean by “climate justice” is Carbon Communism.

That’s the shadow cast by this new globalist dictate, as it green-lights the growth of the Net Zero nanny state.

The science justifying the World Court’s opinion is based on social justice, not a complete rendering of all the facts and variables that make up climate science.

If you think I’m exaggerating, note that the language of “oppressor and oppressed” is implied in the repeated use of “climate crisis” and “climate justice” — whatever the latter even really means.

The mandate is also non-binding. Unlike war crimes tribunals, the UN’s Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change is not enforceable. Not yet enforceable, anyway.

As noted above, lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are exactly what the 40-page ICJ advice points us towards.

This mitigation mandate is a glimpse of an encroaching darkness that has little to do with science and everything to do with socialism.

What activists mean by “climate justice” is Carbon Communism. That’s the shadow cast by this new globalist dictate, as it green-lights the growth of the Net Zero nanny state.

CAST OFF DIVINE MORAL LAW AND CHAOS FOLLOWS

Posted on by

Christianity: Bedrock of the West

Let’s get one thing straight: Christianity isn’t just a personal faith, it’s the philosophical bedrock of the West.

The belief in one true God who created humanity in His image and gave us objective moral laws, not scribbled up by politicians or massaged through a PR agency.

That singular idea – that human beings possess inherent dignity because they are created by God – is the cornerstone of liberty.

It’s why you have rights before the government decides to “grant” them. It’s why Western law said kings couldn’t just burn down your cottage on a whim. Because without a divine moral law above man-made authority, all you’re left with is mob rule and whatever slogan trends on social media.

The Old Testament declared, “Thou shalt not kill,” long before modern ideologues dreamt up “restorative justice” for home invaders. It proclaimed, “Thou shall not steal,” centuries before looting was rebranded as “redistributive protest.” It taught, “Honour your father and mother,” back when that wasn’t treated as a micro-aggression. These weren’t just pious suggestions. They were the scaffolding of a civilisation that respected life, property, and family.

Even capitalism – yes, the dreaded engine of Western prosperity – relies on Christian ethics. Why trust a merchant if honesty isn’t a virtue? Why lend money if there’s no cultural expectation to repay it? Try running a free market economy in a society where lying, theft, and envy are morally neutral, or worse, subsidised.

Destroying Our Own Foundations

The irony? The people enjoying the fruits of the West, its freedom of speech, trial by jury, property rights, and the privilege to protest the system while sipping a $7 soy latte, are the same ones most desperate to sever the moral roots of the very tree they’re perched on. And they’re doing it with sanctimonious flair.

Critics dismiss Christianity as outdated. Yet everything they say they cherish – equality, justice, human rights – is completely dependent on the belief that those rights were granted by God. Strip that away, and you don’t get utopia. You get power games, surveillance states, and drag queen story hour for children.

Without Christianity, Western civilisation isn’t “liberated” – it’s unmoored. Our freedom didn’t emerge from the Enlightenment as if by magic. It was born at the cross, where Christ taught that liberty starts in the heart, not in legislation.

Christianity provided the moral foundation for the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen.

And it’s about time we stopped apologising for that.

THE GREATEST JOY – KNOWING THAT GOD LOVES YOU

Posted on by

This is the power of our Heavenly Father’s love.

“You make known to me the path of life; you will fill me no with joy in your presence, with eternal pleasures at your right hand.” — Psalm 16:11

When we are in Christ, we can experience this love, not as an abstract concept, but as a living reality. God’s love meets us exactly where we are. If you’re lonely, He promises, “Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you” (Hebrews 13:5). If anxiety is crushing you, He whispers, “Cast all your anxiety on me because I care for you” (1 Peter 5:7). If you’ve been hurt or abandoned, He reminds you, “I’ve been there — I was pierced by the world I came to save. And I will wipe every tear from your eyes” (Revelation 21:4). If you feel worthless, He gently declares, “You are made in My image, and in Christ, you are My beloved child” (Genesis 1:27; 1 John 3:1).

Whatever ache you carry, the love of the Father has already gone deeper.

We often try to meet these deep needs with the things of this world. In fact, our desire for worldly solutions and pleasures can sometimes dominate. There is something my old pastor used to say about this that has stuck with me: “The problem isn’t that our desire is too big. It’s that it’s too small.” We settle for so little — momentary thrills, comforts galore, endless streams of entertainment, accumulating wealth, or the approval of crowds. We chase these things hoping they’ll give us meaning and heal our pain. But they never do.

Yet there’s something far greater offered to us: the joy of the Father’s presence.

King David expresses it so beautifully in Psalm 16:11: “You make known to me the path of life; you will fill me with joy in your presence, with eternal pleasures at your right hand.” In His presence is fullness of joy. Not momentary fun. Not a hit of dopamine. But joy that endures — eternal pleasure grounded in relationship with God Himsel

This article by Kurt Mahlberg appeared at the right time for me. I had to call 000 as I thought both my cardiac and respiratory systems were in failure. I am in hospital and responding to treatment. It was nice to be reminded who to turn to and where my ultimate joy will be derived from.

EFFORTS BEING MADE TO RESTORE NATIONAL BIBLICAL VALUES

Posted on by

Conservatives from around the world recently met in Budapest to encourage fellow Europeans to take back their countries in order to realign with their original biblical values. In the opening ceremony, participants sang the Hungarian national anthem and then listened to the “Star Spangled Banner.” Some three thousand conservatives from Hungary, Europe, and around the world came to back up the values of God, homeland, and family. Milos Szantho, the chairman of CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) Hungary, told CBN News, “We managed to build up the broadest coalition of patriotic forces here at CPAC-Hungary, not only from a European perspective, but from a global one.

Milos said, the Trump tornado has swept across the world and changed it completely. He has given hope back to the world. We are no longer drowning in a sea of woke. We are not overrun by migrants. He gave us back the hope of a normal life. He gave us back the hope of peace.”

LIFE SIZED REPLICA OF NOAH’S ARK

Posted on by

‘FOX & Friends’ host Ainsley Earhardt gets a first-hand look at the incredible Ark Encounter , featuring a life-size replica of Noah’s Ark in Williamstown, Kentucky. Ainsley Earhardt and her daughter, along with some friends, met Answers in Genesis (AIG) speaker Bryan Osborne at the Ark and were videoed for this segment.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1114379204042275

AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL SCHOOL REWRITES EXAM TO APPEASE RADICAL TRANSGENDER IDEOLOGUES

Posted on by

A disturbing exam question from an Australian medical school shows how scientific accuracy is being sacrificed for conformity to transgender ideology, casting serious doubt on the integrity of modern medical education and the future quality of patient care.

Below is a screenshot of a real question in a test for a fourth-year paediatric module in a medical school in Australia. The sender has requested to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, as they would no doubt be penalised for challenging the school’s political narrative.

It is incredibly alarming that this medical school has thrown out scientifically accurate terminology and concepts to appease transgender ideologues. The question is the promotion of a political narrative — it is not based on facts or reality.

Transgender Medical Exam Question

The question reads:

A 28 year old transgender man presents to the General Practice clinic with his two-week old infant. He gave birth vaginally after an uncomplicated pregnancy during which he temporarily discontinued testosterone therapy. He has not had a double mastectomy. He expresses a desire to breastfeed but is concerned about resuming testosterone. He has no significant medical history apart from gender dysphoria and takes no medications currently. On examination, both he and the infant appear well with vital signs within normal limits. The infant is gaining weight appropriately.”

Which of the following is the most appropriate management plan?

Choose the single best answer

  • Continue without testosterone while chestfeeding
  • Resume testosterone with concurrent chestfeeding
  • Commence formula feeding only
  • Start microdosing testosterone while chestfeeding
  • Alternate between formula and chestfeeding

Truth v Transgender Ideology

A human with a female reproductive system and the ability to give birth and breastfeed is a female. There is no evidence that any kind of man can perform this uniquely female accomplishment.

This medical school is redefining common language and scientific concepts. They are displaying utter contempt for reality and biology. How on earth can they be trusted to train up the next generation of medical practitioners when they care so little for accuracy and facts?

Changing pronouns or names, wearing costumes or taking drugs does not change the reality that it is only females who have a vagina, cervix, uterus, ovaries and breasts.

Redefining breastfeeding as “chestfeeding” is ludicrous. “Chest” refers to a relatively large anatomical region that contains a number of systems – cardiovascular, respiratory and mammary glands among them.

Breasts are an organ that produce breast milk by females for their babies. Redefining words won’t change this fact. Appeasing activists won’t enhance the level of professional, evidence-based care. It reduces a person to unreliable feelings that can minimise or ignore serious medical issues.

Indoctrinating medical trainees — gaslighting them with words and concepts that are clearly not biologically or anatomically correct — will reduce medical standards and trust. This is a clear breach of ethical and medical standards.

This is just another Biblical prophesied end-times sign prior to Jesus soon return with the glorified Saints to restore righteousness and institute His Millennial reign. This earth has another 1000 years before God destroys it with fire. After the final resurrection of the dead and the White Throne judgement, the apostle John sees a new Jerusalem descending from heaven on to a new Earth.

“Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.” Revelation 21:1-4

This post was taken from an article written by Kirralie Smith. She is the director of Binary, an organisation that fights the de-gendering of Australian society and celebrates the true diversity of men and women.