“The law of the LORD is perfect, reviving the soul; the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple; the precepts of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart; the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes; the fear of the LORD is clean, enduring forever; the rules of the LORD are true, and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, even much fine gold; sweeter also than honey and drippings of the honeycomb. Moreover, by them is your servant warned; in keeping them there is great reward.”Psalms 19:7-11
Youth crime and violence are on the rise across Australia. A recent article in The Guardian reads,
The state’s overall offence rate has increased by 15% but youth crime has seen an even bigger increase.
“Youth offending also continues to grow, with crimes committed by children aged 10 to 17 up 17.9%. It is the second quarter in a row that youth crime rates have reached record levels. Police said children (10 – 17 yrs) only accounted for 13.1% of all offenders, but they were overrepresented in serious and violent crimes such as robberies (63.1%), aggravated burglaries (46%) and car theft (26.9%).”
A study in the USA called “Father Absence and Youth Incarceration” showed that boys who are fatherless from birth are three times more likely to go to jail than peers from intact families. While boys who do not see their father depart until they are 10 to 14 years old are over two times more likely to go to jail than peers from intact families.
Interestingly, Dr Pat Fagan showed that states in the USA with a lower percentage of single-parent families, on average, had lower rates of juvenile crime. State-by-state analysis indicated that, in general, a 10 per cent increase in the number of children living in single-parent homes (including divorces) accompanied a 17 per cent increase in juvenile crime.
Fagan, in his article, “The Real Root Causes of Violent Crime: The Breakdown of Marriage, Family, and Community”, demonstrates the correlation between marriage and fatherhood and what the absence of both does to our children.Among married two-parent families, whether white or black, the crime rate was very low. The capacity and determination to maintain stable married relationships, not race, was the pivotal factor. Chaotic, broken communities resulted from chaotic, broken families.
Rejecting God’s ordinance for marriage: one man and one woman for life so they become one flesh (Genesis 2:24), is why we no longer have stable God fearing homes.
Jesus tells us what end times families will do: “And brother will deliver brother over to death, and the father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death. And you will be hated by all for my name’s sake.” Mark 13:12
The state’s overall offence rate has increased by 15% but youth crime has seen an even bigger increase.
“Youth offending also continues to grow, with crimes committed by children aged 10 to 17 up 17.9%. It is the second quarter in a row that youth crime rates have reached record levels. Police said children (10 – 17 yrs) only accounted for 13.1% of all offenders, but they were overrepresented in serious and violent crimes such as robberies (63.1%), aggravated burglaries (46%) and car theft (26.9%).”
Biblical end times prophecies are being fulfilled at an increasing rate (like birth pains) just as Jesus predicted.
“For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these are but the beginning of the birth pains.”Matthew 24:7-8
The world is being prepared for demons presenting themselves as saviours of the human race. One only has to see the number of movies and video games of aliens presenting themselves as good guys, here to help the human race.
Even more important: “UFO’s and Aliens were seen and being described in the 1940s, 50s, 60s and 70s. Nothing has changed. All we have is better technical equipment, like video on aircraft, so we can pick things up easier; that’s why they are being seen more. We are saying you’ve got to start preparing people for a massive psychological change, whether it’s now or six months or a year’s time. Everything is pointing to ET or non-humans … Seventy years of past history would say they’ve been here all that time, they’re not a threat.” Taken from: The Extra-terrestrial Species Almanac: The Ultimate Guide to Greys, Reptilians, Hybrids, and Nordics (MUFON) Publisher: MUFON, Publication Date: January 1st, 2021, By Craig Campobasso. He claims at least half of the eighty-two extraterrestrial races he has assembled in the book, are indistinguishable from humans and arepeaceful.
While God has given Satan free rein to perform his dastardly deeds, and given each person the freedom to choose his destiny, God always remains in control. Right on God’s schedule and according to his omniscient plan, when wickedness comes up before God’s face (Genesis 19:13), God’s sends his eleventh-hour witness of the judgment and devastation about to come upon the earth. Noah, “a preacher of righteousness” (2 Peter 2: 5), was a witness before the judgment of the flood; Lot was as a witness to Sodom and Gomorrah (2 Peter 2: 6-7); and again, Jonah witnessed to Nineveh (John 1: 2). So too, it will be when Mystery Babylon’s “sins have reached to heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities” (Rev. 18: 5). Therefore, when God decides it is time, and Jesus breaks the first seal, God will send the Two Prophets to the world to witness with signs and wonders of what is coming. Shortly thereafter, Satan will launch his countermove. His decades of UFO-stage-setting will come into focus and take on a new relevance. The UFO/ alien disclosure will be to the Two Witnesses what Pharaoh’s magicians were to Moses and Aaron. So Moses and Aaron went into Pharaoh, and they did so, just as the LORD commanded. And Aaron cast down his rod before Pharaoh and before his servants, and it became a serpent (Exodus 7: 10). But Pharaoh also called the wise men and the sorcerers; so the magicians of Egypt, they also did in like manner with their enchantments (Exodus 7: 11). And Pharaoh’s heart grew hard, and he did not heed them, as the LORD had said (Exodus 7: 13). When Moses and Aaron gave witness of God’s intentions to Pharaoh’s court, their powerful message was not heeded because Satan had previously installed his counterfeits; Today, the idea of directed panspermia, the thousands of UFO sightings, alien abductions, etc. are the modern equivalent to Pharaoh’s court, installed beforehand so the world will not heed the message of the Two Witnesses despite their supernatural powers.
Time is short you need to decide to whom you will submit your life. Will it be to God by accepting Jesus as your Lord and Saviour or to Satan and his Antichrist. Your eternal destiny will be decided by your choice – the new Heaven and new Earth or the Lake of Fire (Revelation 20:15 and 21:1-3)
If only the world knew that the tiny nation of Israel is the nation God established for His purposes and in the not too distant future it will finally fulfill its destiny when Jesus returns to destroy the Antichrist’s army at the battle of Armageddon. Jesus will then set up His Millennial Kingdom from a reconstructed Jerusalem on the highest mountain of the world.
Jerusalem in the Millennium on the highest mountain. During the time God pours out His wrath upon an unrepentant world with the Trumpet (Revelation 8:6-) and Bowl judgements (Revelation 16:1-), the topography of the world is changed.
“And every island fled away, and no mountains were to be found. And great hailstones, about one hundred pounds each, fell from heaven on people; and they cursed God for the plague of the hail, because the plague was so severe.” Revelation 16:30
Thank goodness God told us in advance how the end times will play out for both Jews and Christians. It is a time of tribulation that escalates to great tribulation before God steps in and raptures the living Saints to heaven, but not before He raises the dead in Christ first.
Where do you stand with God? Proverbs 9:10 tells us that: “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom”, do you fear Him? You should as He hold your future in His hands. If you reject His wonderful offer of salvation through Jesus Christ then you will face His coming wrath, poured out with the Trumpet and Bowl judgements. I have given you the Scriptures outlining what is coming, Do you really want to face them?
The fifth Trumpet judgement: “Then from the smoke came locusts on the earth, and they were given power like the power of scorpions of the earth. They were told not to harm the grass of the earth or any green plant or any tree, but only those people who do not have the seal of God on their foreheads. They were allowed to torment them for five months, but not to kill them, and their torment was like the torment of a scorpion when it stings someone. And in those days people will seek death and will not find it. They will long to die, but death will flee from them.” Revelation 9:3-6
Time is short, This is the most important decision you will ever make, Where you spend eternity is the outcome.
Dr Jereth Kok Guilty of Professional Misconduct for Social Media Posts, Tribunal Rules, Kurt Mahlburg, 28 July 2025 NEWS
A landmark free speech case has found that Dr Jereth Kok’s Christian and conservative views disqualify him from medical practice, even though his social media posts weren’t directed at patients and most were shared with limited visibility.
In a 186-page ruling handed down last Tuesday, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) found that Dr Kok’s deeply held religious views, expressed on social media between 2008 and 2022, were sufficient grounds to indefinitely suspend him from the medical profession.
Dr Kok — who had no prior history of patient complaints or professional misconduct before his suspension — now faces a separate sanctions hearing in early 2026 that could result in the full cancellation of his medical license.
In Medical Board of Australia v Dr Jereth Kok, VCAT assessed 85 social media posts made by Dr Kok on topics ranging from abortion to same-sex marriage, sex change surgery for children, COVID-19 mandates and “conversion therapy” bans.
The Tribunal concluded that two-thirds of the posts “denigrated, demeaned and slurred” members of protected identity groups and other medical practitioners, and also contributed to vaccine hesitancy.
Other posts cited in Dr Kok’s suspension took aim at so-called “gender-affirming care” — a protocol that can result in chemical and surgical castration, and that remains the subject of growing controversy and regulatory pushback around the world.
The Tribunal ruled that, by sharing Deeming’s article, Dr Kok “failed to behave professionally and courteously to other medical practitioners, as it referred to medical practitioners involved in the treatment of gender dysphoria as ‘mad scientists’ and engaging in transgender ideology”.
Attention Victorian parents. One part of the diabolical ‘conversion or suppression’ bill that has received comparatively less attention: parents who try to STOP their child being sent away for bodily disfigurement will be charged with domestic violence. Yes, you read that right. Standing in the way of permanent bodily injury = violence. Sign this open letter to the Premier.
VCAT ruled that this post “failed to respect gender diversity” and was “denigrating, demeaning, disrespectful and derogatory to LGBTQI+ persons as it indicates that treatment for gender dysphoria is bodily disfigurement”.
Another post cited in the suspension of Dr Kok’s medical registration was an article he authored at Eternity News, formerly Australia’s flagship evangelical news website, titled “A Medical Perspective on Transgender”.
In ruling against Dr Kok, the Tribunal rejected his argument during cross-examination that gender dysphoria is a pathological or delusional belief analogous to other mistaken self-perceptions like anorexia nervosa. It also dismissed his claim that transgender identities are often shaped more by cultural trends and personal choice than irresistible feelings.
Jesus told us that in the last days persecution of Christians will increase because we hold to God’s values. The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) found that Dr Kok’s deeply held religious views, expressed on social media between 2008 and 2022, were sufficient grounds to indefinitely suspend him from the medical profession.
“Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake. And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another. And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” Matthew 24:9-14
Christianity is at risk of being “wiped out” in parts of the world due to intensifying persecution, the United Kingdom’s special envoy for freedom of religion or belief, David Smith, has warned. The British government is now targeting 10 countries as part of its revised foreign policy focus to defend this human right. Smith, the Labour Party MP for North Northumberland, made the remarks during a briefing at the Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office.
Jesus was asked by His disciples: “What will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” Matthew 24:3
Jesus response: “And you will hear of wars and rumours of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet. For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these are but the beginning of the birth pains. “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake. And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another. And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” Matthew 24:6-14
Smith, a Christian who previously worked with Tearfund and the Bible Society made no mention of the fact that what is unfolding fits with end times prophecies. but he did announced a new plan to prioritize Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) in countries where religious minorities face repression or violence. Smith said the U.K. will focus on 10 countries, naming Vietnam, Algeria, India, Nigeria, Pakistan, China, Syria, Ukraine, Afghanistan and Iraq. He said these were selected because of the severity of need, the U.K.’s diplomatic ties and the possibility of making progress.
He added that persecution, carried out both by governments and social groups, can involve harassment by police, social ostracism, detention without cause, denial of citizenship, torture, attacks on places of worship and even killings, citing research by the Pew Research Centre. He cited recent data showing that 380 million Christians face persecution worldwide and warned, “Persecution on the basis of religion or belief, enacted by States themselves and social groups, is taking place on every continent in the world.” Smith called the U.K.’s commitment “a new chapter” in foreign policy and said freedom of religion was interlinked with other liberties, including freedom of speech, conscience and assembly. Of the 10 selected, only three — Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan — are among the top 10 in the Open Doors World Watch List, which identifies countries where Christians are most severely persecuted. The worst offenders on that list, such as North Korea, Somalia and Yemen, are not among the U.K.’s current
The U.K. government’s FoRB strategy involves five strands. First, it aims to uphold international standards through bodies such as the U.N. and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Second, it will embed the issue into targeted bilateral diplomacy, encouraging individual missions to raise FoRB in foreign capitals. Third, the U.K. will strengthen international coalitions working on religious freedom. Fourth, the Foreign Office will incorporate FoRB into its mainstream human rights programming. The fifth strand involves collaboration with civil society groups working on interfaith respect and awareness. Speaking at the briefing, Lord Collins of Highbury, minister for human rights, said the U.K. has long believed that rights and the rule of law strengthen global prosperity and resilience. He said his office had already written to British heads of mission directing them to embed human rights, including FoRB, into all areas of diplomatic work. He cited the recent release of two individuals — Nigerian atheist Mubarak Bala and Cuban Pastor Lorenzo Rosales Fajardo — as examples of successful British-supported advocacy.
“Only by working together can we build a world where everyone, everywhere, can live with dignity, free to believe — or not believe — without fear,” Lord Collins said. In April, during a debate, Smith said Britain’s diplomatic stance is informed by its own history, moving “from persecution to pluralism,” which he said provides credibility to advocate abroad. He described the U.K. as “uniquely well placed” to act in support of religious liberty, citing its legacy of legal rights and peaceful pluralism. The role of FoRB envoy was created following a 2019 report by then-Bishop of Truro, Philip Mounstephen, which found that Foreign Office staff lacked awareness of global religious persecution. The report led to recommendations that religious freedom be formally integrated into U.K. foreign policy. Smith argued that defending FoRB not only benefits persecuted communities but also those who engage in repression. He said FoRB could unlock new opportunities and freedoms for their nations to flourish and reaffirmed his commitment to press the U.K. government to act. Meanwhile, Christian Today noted that new research by Jersey Road PR has found that mainstream U.K. media rarely report on attacks against Christians globally.
The opposition Nehemiah received to rebuilding the ruined wall of the city of Jerusalem was intense.
“And I looked and arose and said to the nobles and to the officials and to the rest of the people, “Do not be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your brothers, your sons, your daughters, your wives, and your homes.” Nehemiah 4:14
Nehemiah’s story reminds us that vision always invites opposition. It’s not a question of if resistance will come — it’s when. And like Nehemiah, we must be ready.
When Nehemiah first declared his intent to rebuild Jerusalem’s walls, the opposition came swiftly. Sanballat and Tobiah mocked him, hoping to discourage the work before it began (Nehemiah 2:19). But Nehemiah didn’t waste energy arguing or defending himself. Instead, he declared boldly, “The God of heaven will give us success” (Nehemiah 2:20), and then he acted. His declaration was followed by the tangible obedience of God’s people, with priests and families taking up tools and rebuilding the gates and walls.
This is a key lesson for us: vision must be voiced, and faith must move our hands. When opposition comes early, our best weapon is conviction turned into action.
But opposition doesn’t only come at the beginning — it often intensifies midway. As the wall reached halfway, Nehemiah faced perhaps the most dangerous challenge yet: discouragement from within. The people grew weary, overwhelmed by the rubble. The enemies plotted to strike when no one was looking. It could have unravelled everything.
Nehemiah responded by pairing prayer with protection. He called on God, yes — but he also posted guards. He didn’t ignore the threat, nor did he allow fear to paralyse them. Then he stood before the people with this rallying cry: “Don’t be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your families” (Nehemiah 4:14).
That one verse contains the heart of godly leadership: a reminder of God’s greatness and a call to protect what matters most. It wasn’t just about the wall. It was about legacy, security, and God’s people stepping into their destiny.
Even after the wall was completed, Nehemiah wasn’t done with opposition. His enemies shifted tactics — no longer able to stop the work, they tried to steal his peace. They sent letters, spread gossip, and even used insiders to speak well of the enemy in Nehemiah’s presence (Nehemiah 6:17-19). Intimidation doesn’t always come as direct threat — it can be subtle, exhausting, persistent.
And yet, Nehemiah stood firm. The wall was completed in 52 days — a miracle by any measure — but the greater miracle was that Nehemiah remained unmoved in his purpose, even when the pressure shifted from external attack to internal erosion.
We must learn this pattern. At the start, we respond with declaration and action. In the middle, we must engage in prayer and protection. And after the victory, we stand in discernment and resolve, guarding the peace we’ve fought for.
This is not a one-time battle. Moses, Joseph, and even Jesus encountered wave after wave of resistance. It’s the nature of kingdom work. We are rebuilding in a time of spiritual vulnerability, but we are not without weapons. We’ve been given divine authority, heavenly wisdom, and the call to persevere.
As Nehemiah fought for the dignity of a people, we are called to fight for our families, our communities, and the moral fabric of our nation. Let us not grow weary. Let us not be caught off guard by resistance. The presence of opposition may be the clearest confirmation that we are doing what matters most.
God has begun a work through you — He will see it to completion.
Welcome to Country is controversial. Deeply. It divides Australians by ancestry, not allegiance. And Albanese knows it. He just doesn’t care, which is foolish, and it may cost him dearly.
He called it a “a hand warmly and graciously extended,” a symbol of unity. But how is it unifying to be told, day in and day out, that you need permission to enter your own country? How is it respectful to redefine Australians as tenants on ancestral land they supposedly never had a right to?
This isn’t some harmless courtesy. It’s a rhetorical landmine, paving the way for treaty, reparations, land vetoes, and perpetual grievance. “Always was, always will be.”
That’s how the slogan goes. That the land upon which the nation of Australia was built has forever been and forever will be under Aboriginal ownership.
But that’s not history. Rather, it’s a political claim of ongoing Indigenous sovereignty, directly contradicting High Court precedent and undermining the very legitimacy of the Australian nation-state. The Crown’s sovereignty is the foundation of our law. And yet we now begin our parliamentary business by implying it never existed.
And Albanese calls this uncontroversial?
Australians Have Had Enough
Aboriginal woman and Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price put it best: “Everyone’s getting sick of Welcome to Country.” It tells ordinary Australians they’re outsiders in the country they built, defended, and passed down through generations. The public agrees. Polling shows a clear majority now see these rituals as divisive.
A major poll of over 1,000 Australians conducted for the Institute of Public Affairs just last month confirms the shift: 56% of Australians now see Welcome to Country as divisive, while just 17% disagree. Fewer than one in three support the practice at events like ANZAC Day or sporting matches, and even among young Australians who normally support progressive fads, opinion is split.
Yet, despite the majority view, these rituals are conducted everywhere: before sports games, school assemblies, corporate webinars, and even weather forecasts. What used to be occasional is now obligatory. And like all forced rituals, its meaning has rotted into performance.
Let’s not pretend it’s “ancient” either. The modern Welcome to Country, body paint, didgeridoos, and scripted lines, is largely a 1970s invention, created by famous Australian Aboriginal Ernie Dingo and refined during the tourism boom.
And when we do these ceremonies, are we even sure that the so-called “traditional owners” are even the right one? Canberra’s “traditional ownership” is disputed between Ngunnawal and Ngambri groups, proving how shaky the whole edifice is. Look to just about any region in the country and I can show you warring groups of Aboriginals who claim that they are the rightful “traditional owners” over the other mob who claim the same thing.
The Financial — and Spiritual — Cost
If you’re Christian? Tough luck. Smoking ceremonies invoke spirits. They’re religious rites, not “cultural displays.” The Presbyterian Church has told its congregations not to participate. Yet we now open Parliament with them, as if the separation of church and state has been tossed into the firepit along with the gum leaves.
And the cost? It’s not just spiritual. The whole Welcome to Country farce also comes with a financial price tag. Freedom of Information documents show single ceremonies cost up to $6,600. Government departments are burning through taxpayer cash for smoke and theatre while remote schools rot and Indigenous literacy flatlines. One smoking ceremony could air-condition a classroom in Arnhem Land. But priorities, right?
Let’s not forget: Australians already voted on this nonsense. In the 2023 Voice referendum, they overwhelmingly rejected the entire race-based agenda. Sixty percent said no. Every state bar the ACT — the same bubble that hosts Parliament — voted it down.
But none of that matters to the elites. It’s not about truth. It’s about control. This is coercive speech. Refuse to recite it and you’re a bigot. Go along with it, and endorse a racial hierarchy where whitey is right at the bottom.
So when Albanese tells you there’s no controversy, he’s not speaking for you. He’s speaking to Canberra, to the elite, to the bureaucrats and boardrooms who recite the lines without believing them.
What we need is a national reset.
Start our events with this: “We gather as free and equal citizens of one Australia.”
And then acknowledge those who have fought and died for our nation.
No smoke. No spirits. No submission.
That’s unity. That’s patriotism. That’s truth.
And that, Prime Minister, is not controversial.
This post is taken from an article by George Christensen.
Being Welcomed to Your Own Country Not Controversial, Says PM. on 24/07/2025.
George Christensen is an Australian politician and former journalist who was a member of the Australian House of Representatives from 2010 to 2022, as the member of parliament (MP) for the division of Dawson. He was a member of the Liberal National Party of Queensland and sat with the National Party in federal parliament, prior to leaving the party in April 2022, days before the end of his parliamentary term.
In a 40-page mandate released on Wednesday, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) told nations to fall in line or face the World Court’s wrath.
Countries that fail to align with what amounts to Gaian worship will be punished with a similar ferocity of “justice” to those that commit war crimes, the court warned.
Consequences for not taking climate justice seriously, the ruling said, include “paying full reparations, restitution, compensation, and/or satisfaction.”
The ICJ added that any nation in breach of its Carbon Zero commitments — as outlined by the 2015 Paris Agreement, among others — must “employ all means at their disposal to ensure compliance.”
Despite the mandate not defining what compliance by “any means necessary” would look like, it’s fair to assume this means mutating Carbon Zero into Carbon Communism.
Lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are all measures prescribed by today’s climate catastrophists.
Carbon passports have already been tabled in the United Kingdom’s Net Zero nanny state, and are defined by the Institute of Sustainability Studies as:
Notably, the ICJ admitted climate change reparations may be “difficult to calculate, because of uncertainty about the role anthropogenic climate change played in causing the damage.”
Acknowledging its limited reach, the World Court concluded that it could only offer judicial advice in response to questions about who’s to blame and for what. At the same time, the ICJ said its latest “climate justice” ruling is unprecedented.
Climate catastrophism “is more than a legal problem,” the court determined. Rather, it is an “existential problem of planetary proportions that imperils all forms of life and the very health of our planet.”
Unsurprisingly, the IJC finished by implying that the “lasting solution” was compliance with Carbon Communism.
The only satisfactory answer, it said, is social and political action that “changes our habits, comforts and current way of life in order to secure a future.”
Overall, the World Court’s so-called urgent and “game-changing” determination is toothless. It is ultimately only the opinion of the UN court in answer to young climate activists who claim that islands like Vanuatu are shrinking.
It’s of no surprise that UN boss and “global boiling” believer Antonio Guterres was overjoyed by his court advocating COVID-like, climate crisis mitigation mandates.
Following claims that the so-called “climate crisis was laying waste to lives and livelihoods,” Guterres welcomed the ICJ’s ruling.
“They have made it very clear,” he said, “that States are obligated under international law to protect the global climate system.”
“This is a victory for our planet, for climate justice and for the power of young people to make a difference.”
The science justifying the World Court’s opinion is based on social justice, not a complete rendering of all the facts and variables that make up climate science. If you think I’m exaggerating, note that the language of “oppressor and oppressed” is implied in the repeated use of “climate crisis” and “climate justice” — whatever the latter even really means.
The mandate is also non-binding. Unlike war crimes tribunals, the UN’s Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change is not enforceable. Not yet enforceable, anyway.
As I’ve noted above, lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are exactly what the 40-page ICJ advice points us towards.
This mitigation mandate is a glimpse of an encroaching darkness that has little to do with science and everything to do with socialism.
What activists mean by “climate justice” is Carbon Communism. That’s the shadow cast by this new globalist dictate, as it green-lights the growth of the Net Zero nanny state.
The science justifying the World Court’s opinion is based on social justice, not a complete rendering of all the facts and variables that make up climate science.
If you think I’m exaggerating, note that the language of “oppressor and oppressed” is implied in the repeated use of “climate crisis” and “climate justice” — whatever the latter even really means.
The mandate is also non-binding. Unlike war crimes tribunals, the UN’s Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change is not enforceable.
Not yet enforceable, anyway.
As I’ve noted above, lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are exactly what the 40-page ICJ advice points us towards.
This mitigation mandate is a glimpse of an encroaching darkness that has little to do with science and everything to do with socialism.
What activists mean by “climate justice” is Carbon Communism.
That’s the shadow cast by this new globalist dictate, as it green-lights the growth of the Net Zero nanny state.
The science justifying the World Court’s opinion is based on social justice, not a complete rendering of all the facts and variables that make up climate science.
If you think I’m exaggerating, note that the language of “oppressor and oppressed” is implied in the repeated use of “climate crisis” and “climate justice” — whatever the latter even really means.
The mandate is also non-binding. Unlike war crimes tribunals, the UN’s Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change is not enforceable. Not yet enforceable, anyway.
As noted above, lockdowns, personal carbon credit scores, carbon taxes, petrol car bans, energy rationing, and carbon passports are exactly what the 40-page ICJ advice points us towards.
This mitigation mandate is a glimpse of an encroaching darkness that has little to do with science and everything to do with socialism.
What activists mean by “climate justice” is Carbon Communism. That’s the shadow cast by this new globalist dictate, as it green-lights the growth of the Net Zero nanny state.
Let’s get one thing straight: Christianity isn’t just a personal faith, it’s the philosophical bedrock of the West.
The belief in one true God who created humanity in His image and gave us objective moral laws, not scribbled up by politicians or massaged through a PR agency.
That singular idea – that human beings possess inherent dignity because they are created by God – is the cornerstone of liberty.
It’s why you have rights before the government decides to “grant” them. It’s why Western law said kings couldn’t just burn down your cottage on a whim. Because without a divine moral law above man-made authority, all you’re left with is mob rule and whatever slogan trends on social media.
The Old Testament declared, “Thou shalt not kill,” long before modern ideologues dreamt up “restorative justice” for home invaders. It proclaimed, “Thou shall not steal,” centuries before looting was rebranded as “redistributive protest.” It taught, “Honour your father and mother,” back when that wasn’t treated as a micro-aggression. These weren’t just pious suggestions. They were the scaffolding of a civilisation that respected life, property, and family.
Even capitalism – yes, the dreaded engine of Western prosperity – relies on Christian ethics. Why trust a merchant if honesty isn’t a virtue? Why lend money if there’s no cultural expectation to repay it? Try running a free market economy in a society where lying, theft, and envy are morally neutral, or worse, subsidised.
Destroying Our Own Foundations
The irony? The people enjoying the fruits of the West, its freedom of speech, trial by jury, property rights, and the privilege to protest the system while sipping a $7 soy latte, are the same ones most desperate to sever the moral roots of the very tree they’re perched on. And they’re doing it with sanctimonious flair.
Critics dismiss Christianity as outdated. Yet everything they say they cherish – equality, justice, human rights – is completely dependent on the belief that those rights were granted by God. Strip that away, and you don’t get utopia. You get power games, surveillance states, and drag queen story hour for children.
Without Christianity, Western civilisation isn’t “liberated” – it’s unmoored. Our freedom didn’t emerge from the Enlightenment as if by magic. It was born at the cross, where Christ taught that liberty starts in the heart, not in legislation.
Christianity provided the moral foundation for the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen.
And it’s about time we stopped apologising for that.
LIVING ETERNAL NOW 